https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=0199853d-6c4f-712b-a923-837bcf87400a CheckCentral RSS: An optional 4th status in Check Central Sun, 10 May 2026 12:45:58 GMT en hourly 1 https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=0199853d-6c4f-712b-a923-837bcf87400a https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/an-optional-4th-status-in-check-central/?ID=0199853d-6c4f-712b-a923-837bcf87400a#2 Wed, 01 Oct 2025 20:26:17 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/an-optional-4th-status-in-check-central/?ID=0199853d-6c4f-712b-a923-837bcf87400a#2 CheckCentral Interesting idea but I'm not sure if/when we would be able to implement something like that. I've put it on our feature request list for future consideration ]]> https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/an-optional-4th-status-in-check-central/?ID=0199853d-6c4f-712b-a923-837bcf87400a Fri, 26 Sep 2025 08:57:00 GMT Binary Fortress Software https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/an-optional-4th-status-in-check-central/?ID=0199853d-6c4f-712b-a923-837bcf87400a CheckCentral We also use Check Central for reporting to our customers, but when a platform (such as N-Able Cove Data Protection) reports that a job is still running, it appears in our results as failed. This happens because of how we build the check rules. However, it would be nice to have an optional fourth status with separate conditions. In our case, we could mark that status as Still running or something similar. ]]>