<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>CheckCentral RSS: Recipient Groups</title>
<atom:link href="https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c</link>
<description>CheckCentral RSS: Recipient Groups</description>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 22:28:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<language>en</language>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/RSS/?TopicID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c</generator>
<item>
<title>RE: Recipient Groups</title>
<link>https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/recipient-groups/?ID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c#4</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:16:32 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/recipient-groups/?ID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c#4</guid>
<category>CheckCentral</category>
<description><![CDATA[@QuantumTravel: I've added your vote to the open feature request for this. We will be sure to post an update here when we're able to implement something like this!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
@QuantumTravel: I've added your vote to the open feature request for this. We will be sure to post an update here when we're able to implement something like this!
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: Recipient Groups</title>
<link>https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/recipient-groups/?ID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c#3</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:25:46 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/recipient-groups/?ID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c#3</guid>
<category>CheckCentral</category>
<description><![CDATA[This is an excellent idea and one that I was asked yesterday when I was demonstrating this solution to the team. Are there any further thoughts / plans on this?
Certain individuals here would be very keen to receive key alerts for certain systems/processes, which may not be of 'key' interest to ...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
This is an excellent idea and one that I was asked yesterday when I was demonstrating this solution to the team. Are there any further thoughts / plans on this?<br/>
<br/>
Certain individuals here would be very keen to receive key alerts for certain systems/processes, which may not be of 'key' interest to the rest of the team - certainly not worthy of a push or text alert to them.<br/>
<br/>
Also, we were discussing deploying the solution to other company divisions to obtain greater visibility on status/health for backups etc. In this case, we would not require everyone to receive alerts, only those individuals at their respective sites, though the overall reporting & visibility would be of great benefit.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>RE: Recipient Groups</title>
<link>https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/recipient-groups/?ID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c#2</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 16:51:54 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/recipient-groups/?ID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c#2</guid>
<category>CheckCentral</category>
<description><![CDATA[Interesting usage case, David! It's not currently possible with the way the notifications are setup, but we'll definitely put this on our list for further review.
Thanks!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
Interesting usage case, David! It's not currently possible with the way the notifications are setup, but we'll definitely put this on our list for further review.<br/>
<br/>
Thanks!
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Recipient Groups</title>
<link>https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/recipient-groups/?ID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:52:20 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Binary Fortress Software</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.checkcentral.cc/Discussions/View/recipient-groups/?ID=76c8f78b-3fbd-49bf-a03d-5971142e0c3c</guid>
<category>CheckCentral</category>
<description><![CDATA[We're using Check Central across multiple areas of the department - server alerts, websites, door access, etc.. CheckCentral is a gift from the gods!
Is it possible to have more granular notifications so that only some individuals receive an SMS message relating to door access issues and others ...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="CTDiscussions">
We're using Check Central across multiple areas of the department - server alerts, websites, door access, etc.. CheckCentral is a gift from the gods! <br/>
<br/>
Is it possible to have more granular notifications so that only some individuals receive an SMS message relating to door access issues and others only get a push if a particular web site is down?
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>